Michigan Approves 24% Wholesale Cannabis Tax, Sparking Industry Outcry and Fears of Black Market Resurgence

LANSING, MI – Michigan lawmakers have passed a contentious 24% wholesale tax on marijuana, a move projected to generate approximately $420 million annually for state road and bridge repairs. The legislation, which was approved as part of a larger budget deal, is slated to take effect on January 1, 2026, but has been met with fierce opposition from industry leaders who warn it could cripple businesses, lead to job losses, and push consumers back to the illicit market.

This new tax represents a significant increase to the existing tax structure for legal cannabis. Consumers already pay a 10% excise tax and a 6% sales tax on recreational marijuana purchases. The additional 24% wholesale tax, levied on sales between growers/processors and retailers, is expected to drive up prices by an estimated $3 to $4 per gram. Industry advocates argue this will make legal cannabis prohibitively expensive, reversing years of progress in establishing a safe and regulated market.

A Budding Industry Faces a Steep Climb

Michigan has become a national leader in cannabis sales, surpassing even California in volume despite having a smaller population. This success has been largely attributed to competitive pricing and a more accessible regulatory environment compared to some other states. However, the market has also faced challenges, including an oversupply of product that has driven down prices for consumers but squeezed profit margins for cultivators and retailers.

“It’s like a gut punch to the industry,” said Al Williams, president of the Detroit Cannabis Industry Association. “We’re already overtaxed from the federal government, we were already taxed heavily from the state government, and now to have a 24% increase, a lot of people are going to figure out whether this industry is worthwhile.”

Industry leaders point to the struggles in states like California, which has grappled with high taxes and a persistent illicit market. Governor Gavin Newsom recently opted to reduce a significant tax increase on his state’s legal cannabis industry, a move cited as a cautionary tale for Michigan.

Concerns Over Market Impact and Job Security

Business owners and advocates express grave concerns about the impact on smaller operations, particularly in urban areas like Detroit and Flint. They predict that independent, family-owned, and social equity businesses, which often operate on thinner margins, will be the hardest hit. The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association is reportedly considering legal action, arguing that the wholesale tax may violate the voter-approved 2018 legalization law, which did not include such a tax.

“This is going to be a nail in the coffin, especially for mom and pops,” stated Tom Farrell, owner of The Refinery dispensaries. “The industry is in turmoil right now.” With sales down and margins shrinking, many fear this additional tax burden will accelerate business closures and lead to widespread layoffs.

Governor Whitmer, while sympathetic to the industry’s concerns, has stated that the 24% tax is comparable to rates in other legalized states and is not out of line with taxes on tobacco or alcohol. However, critics argue that Michigan’s previous tax rates were instrumental in its market success and that this increase risks destabilizing the industry.

Revenue Projections and Unintended Consequences

Lawmakers championing the tax assert it will provide crucial funding for much-needed infrastructure improvements. The projected $420 million annual revenue is intended to be dedicated to the Neighborhood Road Fund. However, some analyses suggest the actual revenue generated could be less than anticipated if the higher taxes significantly shrink the legal market and bolster the illicit one.

The legislative journey was not without its hurdles, with the bill passing the House with bipartisan support but facing a narrower margin in the Senate. The outcome is seen by many as a precarious balance between the state’s need for revenue and the viability of its burgeoning cannabis sector.

Beyond the immediate financial implications, the debate highlights broader discussions surrounding cannabis policy. The significant legislative developments in the cannabis sector, like this tax increase, often generate substantial news coverage and are of keen interest to those involved in related industries, including the production of cannabis-themed TV shows, streaming series, and movies. The ongoing news surrounding Michigan’s cannabis market will continue to be a focal point for industry stakeholders and consumers alike.

As January 2026 approaches, the Michigan cannabis industry watches with apprehension, bracing for a new fiscal landscape that could redefine its future and potentially push consumers toward unregulated alternatives.